Benchmarking conventional and machine learning segmentation techniques for digital rock physics analysis of fractured rocks

Marcel Reinhardt, Arne Jacob, Saied Sadeghnejad, Francesco Cappuccio, Pit Arnold, Sascha Frank, Frieder Enzmann, Michael Kersten

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungBegutachtung

Abstract

Image segmentation remains the most critical step in Digital Rock Physics (DRP) workflows, affecting the analysis of physical rock properties. Conventional segmentation techniques struggle with numerous image artifacts and user bias, which lead to considerable uncertainty. This study evaluates the advantages of using the random forest (RF) algorithm for the segmentation of fractured rocks. The segmentation quality is discussed and compared with two conventional image processing methods (thresholding-based and watershed algorithm) and an encoder–decoder network in the form of convolutional neural networks (CNNs). The segmented images of the RF method were used as the ground truth for CNN training. The images of two fractured rock samples are acquired by X-ray computed tomography scanning (XCT). The skeletonized 3D images are calculated, providing information about the mean mechanical aperture and roughness. The porosity, permeability, flow fields, and preferred flow paths of segmented images are analyzed by the DRP approach. Moreover, the breakthrough curves obtained from tracer injection experiments are used as ground truth to evaluate the segmentation quality of each method. The results show that the conventional methods overestimate the fracture aperture. Both machine learning approaches show promising segmentation results and handle all artifacts and complexities without any prior CT-image filtering. However, the RF implementation has superior inherent advantages over CNN. This method is resource-saving (e.g., quickly trained), does not need an extensive training dataset, and can provide the segmentation uncertainty as a measure for evaluating the segmentation quality. The considerable variation in computed rock properties highlights the importance of choosing an appropriate segmentation method.
OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer71
Seitenumfang20
FachzeitschriftEnvironmental Earth Sciences
Jahrgang81.2022
Ausgabenummer1
Frühes Online-Datum25 Jan. 2022
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Feb. 2022

Bibliographische Notiz

Funding Information:
This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi). It is part of the project ReSalt (Reactive Reservoirsystems – Scaling and Erosion and its Impact on Hydraulic and Mechanic Reservoirproperties, grant number: 0324244A). We would like to thank Dustin Hering, Rainer Seehaus and Rafael Schäffer from the TU Darmstadt for providing the fractured cores. We thank Olga Moravcova for her contribution to the first manuscript. The third author (S. S.) gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for his visiting research at the Johannes Gutenberg University at Mainz, Germany. We thank Olaf Kolditz and the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions that helped to improve our manuscript.

Funding Information:
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi). It is part of the project ReSalt (Reactive Reservoirsystems–Scaling and Erosion and its Impact on Hydraulic and Mechanic Reservoirproperties, grant number: 0324244A). This open-access publication was funded by Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz.

Funding Information:
This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi). It is part of the project ReSalt (Reactive Reservoirsystems ? Scaling and Erosion and its Impact on Hydraulic and Mechanic Reservoirproperties, grant number: 0324244A). We would like to thank Dustin Hering, Rainer Seehaus and Rafael Sch?ffer from the TU Darmstadt for providing the fractured cores. We thank Olga Moravcova for her contribution to the first manuscript. The third author (S. S.) gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for his visiting research at the Johannes Gutenberg University at Mainz, Germany. We thank Olaf Kolditz and the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions that helped to improve our manuscript.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).

Dieses zitieren