TY - JOUR
T1 - A Cross-National Study of Disaster Risk Management
T2 - Strengths and Weaknesses in Bulgaria, Romania, and Albania with Reflections on Serbia
AU - Beli, Anja
AU - Renner, Renate
AU - Cvetković , Vladimir M.
AU - Ivanov, Aleksandar
AU - Gačić, Jasmina
PY - 2025/6/16
Y1 - 2025/6/16
N2 - This study examines disaster risk management systems in Bulgaria, Romania, and Albania, high lighting their distinct strengths and weaknesses while drawing comparisons to Serbia’s framework. The research underscores the growing urgency of disaster risk management in addressing challenges posed by natural and man-made (technological) hazards, which are further aggravated by climate change, globalisation, and socio-economic shifts. The study identifies best practices alongside systemic weaknesses by assessing the normative, institutional, and strategic frameworks of these countries. Key strengths include comprehensive legal systems, robust international partnerships, and sophisticated early warning mechanisms. However, these strengths are counterbalanced by limited local capacity, fragmented institutional coordination, and inadequate public awareness. The analysis highlights the potential for regional cooperation through a comparative lens, emphasising the importance of engaging local communities, enhancing early warning technologies, and aligning with global disaster management standards. The findings offer valuable insights into ongoing discussions about constructing resilient societies, providing practical recommendations to enhance disaster risk management systems across Southeastern Europe.
AB - This study examines disaster risk management systems in Bulgaria, Romania, and Albania, high lighting their distinct strengths and weaknesses while drawing comparisons to Serbia’s framework. The research underscores the growing urgency of disaster risk management in addressing challenges posed by natural and man-made (technological) hazards, which are further aggravated by climate change, globalisation, and socio-economic shifts. The study identifies best practices alongside systemic weaknesses by assessing the normative, institutional, and strategic frameworks of these countries. Key strengths include comprehensive legal systems, robust international partnerships, and sophisticated early warning mechanisms. However, these strengths are counterbalanced by limited local capacity, fragmented institutional coordination, and inadequate public awareness. The analysis highlights the potential for regional cooperation through a comparative lens, emphasising the importance of engaging local communities, enhancing early warning technologies, and aligning with global disaster management standards. The findings offer valuable insights into ongoing discussions about constructing resilient societies, providing practical recommendations to enhance disaster risk management systems across Southeastern Europe.
KW - Cross-National Study
KW - Disaster Risk Management
UR - https://internationaljournalofdisasterriskmanagement.com/Vol1/article/view/139
U2 - 10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.1.25
DO - 10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.1.25
M3 - Article
SN - 2620-2662
VL - 7.2025
SP - 431
EP - 460
JO - International journal of disaster risk management
JF - International journal of disaster risk management
IS - 1
M1 - 25
ER -