TY - JOUR
T1 - Bioleaching of Lithium-Ion Battery Black Mass
T2 - A Comparative Study on Gluconobacter oxydans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans
AU - Mandl, Matthias
AU - Lerchbammer, Reinhard
AU - Gerold, Eva
PY - 2025/10/7
Y1 - 2025/10/7
N2 - The growing demand for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) requires efficient and sustainable recycling solutions. This study investigates bioleaching as an alternative to conventional hydrometallurgical methods, focusing on (i) organic acid-mediated leaching with Gluconobacter oxydans and (ii) sulfuric acid bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Experiments were conducted at 26 °C with leaching durations of one to three weeks, depending on the microbial system, at pH 1.35 for sulfuric acid treatments, and with liquid-to-solid ratios equivalent to 100 mL g−1 (A. thiooxidans) or 100 mL g−1 in culture medium (G. oxydans). Results show that indirect bioleaching with G. oxydans achieved high recovery rates for cobalt (96%), manganese (100%), nickel (65%), and lithium (68%), while the direct approach was less effective due to microbial inhibition by black mass components. Similarly, biologically produced sulfuric acid exhibited moderate leaching efficiencies, but chemically synthesized sulfuric acid outperformed it, particularly for nickel (93%) and lithium (76%) after one week of leaching. These findings suggest that bioleaching is a promising, eco-friendly alternative for LIB recycling but requires further process optimization to improve metal recovery and industrial scalability. Future research should explore hybrid approaches combining bioleaching with conventional leaching techniques.
AB - The growing demand for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) requires efficient and sustainable recycling solutions. This study investigates bioleaching as an alternative to conventional hydrometallurgical methods, focusing on (i) organic acid-mediated leaching with Gluconobacter oxydans and (ii) sulfuric acid bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Experiments were conducted at 26 °C with leaching durations of one to three weeks, depending on the microbial system, at pH 1.35 for sulfuric acid treatments, and with liquid-to-solid ratios equivalent to 100 mL g−1 (A. thiooxidans) or 100 mL g−1 in culture medium (G. oxydans). Results show that indirect bioleaching with G. oxydans achieved high recovery rates for cobalt (96%), manganese (100%), nickel (65%), and lithium (68%), while the direct approach was less effective due to microbial inhibition by black mass components. Similarly, biologically produced sulfuric acid exhibited moderate leaching efficiencies, but chemically synthesized sulfuric acid outperformed it, particularly for nickel (93%) and lithium (76%) after one week of leaching. These findings suggest that bioleaching is a promising, eco-friendly alternative for LIB recycling but requires further process optimization to improve metal recovery and industrial scalability. Future research should explore hybrid approaches combining bioleaching with conventional leaching techniques.
U2 - 10.3390/met15101112
DO - 10.3390/met15101112
M3 - Article
SN - 2075-4701
VL - 15.2025
JO - Metals : open access journal
JF - Metals : open access journal
IS - 10
M1 - 1112
ER -