Abstract
Study region
Seven Austrian sites, each representing unique hydroclimatic conditions.
Study focus
Accurate groundwater temperature (GWT) prediction is essential for water management, yet machine learning (ML) applications remain underexplored compared to groundwater level and stream temperature studies. This study introduces a novel comprehensive framework linking GWT regularity and long-term trends derived from entropy and decomposition to optimal model selection and feature engineering. Model performance was assessed across multiple algorithms, ranging from linear approaches to complex ensemble and deep learning, to determine optimal time lags under three predictor sets: (i) time only, (ii) climate only, and (iii) integrated time and climate. Predictor importance was examined using Stepwise Backward Selection (SBS) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA), followed by a direct comparison between the two methods.
New hydrological insights for the region
GWT regimes with high seasonal regularity and stable trends can be predicted accurately with simpler models, whereas irregular regimes benefit from advanced model architectures. Integrating temporal and climate predictors significantly outperforms climate-only models, achieving up to a 78 % NSE increase and a 62 % error reduction. SBS performs comparable to PCA while retaining physical interpretability, identifying air temperature and radiation as dominant predictors.
These findings highlight a site-specific workflow for GWT prediction, combining hydro-climatic diagnostics with regionally tailored ML models to account for local seasonal and trend behaviors supporting improved and regional groundwater management under climate variability.
Seven Austrian sites, each representing unique hydroclimatic conditions.
Study focus
Accurate groundwater temperature (GWT) prediction is essential for water management, yet machine learning (ML) applications remain underexplored compared to groundwater level and stream temperature studies. This study introduces a novel comprehensive framework linking GWT regularity and long-term trends derived from entropy and decomposition to optimal model selection and feature engineering. Model performance was assessed across multiple algorithms, ranging from linear approaches to complex ensemble and deep learning, to determine optimal time lags under three predictor sets: (i) time only, (ii) climate only, and (iii) integrated time and climate. Predictor importance was examined using Stepwise Backward Selection (SBS) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA), followed by a direct comparison between the two methods.
New hydrological insights for the region
GWT regimes with high seasonal regularity and stable trends can be predicted accurately with simpler models, whereas irregular regimes benefit from advanced model architectures. Integrating temporal and climate predictors significantly outperforms climate-only models, achieving up to a 78 % NSE increase and a 62 % error reduction. SBS performs comparable to PCA while retaining physical interpretability, identifying air temperature and radiation as dominant predictors.
These findings highlight a site-specific workflow for GWT prediction, combining hydro-climatic diagnostics with regionally tailored ML models to account for local seasonal and trend behaviors supporting improved and regional groundwater management under climate variability.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 102987 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Journal of hydrology : Regional Studies |
| Volume | 2025 |
| Issue number | Volume 62, December |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 2 Dec 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- Groundwater temperature predictionMachine LearningStatistical LearningDeep LearningClimate change impacts
- Climate change impacts
- Groundwater temperature prediction
- Statistical Learning
- Machine Learning
- Deep Learning
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver