TY - JOUR
T1 - On the Interpretation of Unsteady State Experiments in Heterogeneous Rock by Stochastic Methods
AU - Amrollahinasab Mahdiabad, Omidreza
AU - Jammernegg, Boris
AU - Azizmohammadi, Siroos
AU - Ott, Holger
PY - 2025/6/4
Y1 - 2025/6/4
N2 - Rock heterogeneity has a significant effect on immiscible displacement. This is especially true when the mobility ratio of the two fluids is unfavorable, favoring unstable displacement. However, this is not taken into account in the numerical analysis of classical core flooding experiments to quantify two-phase flow properties using Special Core Analysis (SCAL). Our approach combines the modern interpretation of SCAL data with experimental data measured on rock samples for which the homogeneity assumption - a prerequisite for SCAL experiments - can no longer apply due to their size and heterogeneity. In contrast to other studies that take heterogeneities into account, we focus on simple-to-perform unsteady-state experiments. We analyze these experiments by numerical interpretation using homogeneous and heterogeneous simulation domains and by introducing porosity-based heterogeneity and permeability as well as capillary scaling. In the current study, we first question the applicability of standard relative permeability measurements to heterogeneous rocks and fluids with an excessively high mobility ratio, such as for CO2-brine displacement in heterogeneous rocks. However, we show that they describe two-phase flow very well when porosity-based heterogeneity is taken into account, which is equivalent to downscaling. The study thus shows a way to fall back on established standard measurements if it should be possible to account for subgrid heterogeneities in SCAL workflows. To this end, we propose an approach based on steady-state experiments and appropriate sample selection.
AB - Rock heterogeneity has a significant effect on immiscible displacement. This is especially true when the mobility ratio of the two fluids is unfavorable, favoring unstable displacement. However, this is not taken into account in the numerical analysis of classical core flooding experiments to quantify two-phase flow properties using Special Core Analysis (SCAL). Our approach combines the modern interpretation of SCAL data with experimental data measured on rock samples for which the homogeneity assumption - a prerequisite for SCAL experiments - can no longer apply due to their size and heterogeneity. In contrast to other studies that take heterogeneities into account, we focus on simple-to-perform unsteady-state experiments. We analyze these experiments by numerical interpretation using homogeneous and heterogeneous simulation domains and by introducing porosity-based heterogeneity and permeability as well as capillary scaling. In the current study, we first question the applicability of standard relative permeability measurements to heterogeneous rocks and fluids with an excessively high mobility ratio, such as for CO2-brine displacement in heterogeneous rocks. However, we show that they describe two-phase flow very well when porosity-based heterogeneity is taken into account, which is equivalent to downscaling. The study thus shows a way to fall back on established standard measurements if it should be possible to account for subgrid heterogeneities in SCAL workflows. To this end, we propose an approach based on steady-state experiments and appropriate sample selection.
UR - https://ipjournal.interpore.org/index.php/interpore/article/view/44/66
U2 - 10.69631/ipj.v2i2nr44
DO - 10.69631/ipj.v2i2nr44
M3 - Article
SN - 3007-410X
VL - 2.2025
JO - InterPore journal
JF - InterPore journal
IS - 2
ER -