Abstract
At the occasion of the Consultants Group Meeting held to review the “International Target Values 2010 for Measurement Uncertainties in Safeguarding Nuclear Material” [3], discussions between experts highlighted the need to improve communication between different safeguards measurement communities, e.g. laboratory analysts, non-destructive assay specialists, safeguards data evaluators, and to reconcile their approaches to estimating measurement uncertainties. The purpose of this paper is to contr ibute to reaching a common understanding of the terminology and methodologies used by different professional groups in the field of uncertainty quantification.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 10-29 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | ESARDA Bulletin |
| Volume | 64.2022 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright: © 2022, Publications Office of the European Union. All rights reserved.Keywords
- GUM
- measurement
- nuclear safeguards
- Statistical error model
- terminology
- un-certainty