Why δ is not ‰ and why we should not use ε and μ notations

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

Standard

Why δ is not ‰ and why we should not use ε and μ notations. / Meisel, Thomas C.

In: Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, Vol. 43, No. 4, 01.12.2019, p. 527-528.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

Bibtex - Download

@article{4ae10491fc0f4984a4786f11b794f49c,
title = "Why δ is not ‰ and why we should not use ε and μ notations",
author = "Meisel, {Thomas C.}",
year = "2019",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ggr.12303",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "527--528",
journal = "Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research",
issn = "1639-4488",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why δ is not ‰ and why we should not use ε and μ notations

AU - Meisel, Thomas C.

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075200261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ggr.12303

DO - 10.1111/ggr.12303

M3 - Editorial

AN - SCOPUS:85075200261

VL - 43

SP - 527

EP - 528

JO - Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research

JF - Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research

SN - 1639-4488

IS - 4

ER -